Posted at NoDaddy November 16th
- Roll mouse over the time so the date pops up; leave it.
- Press Shift / PrintScreen (upper right hand).
- Open Paint from Strart/Programs/Accessories
- Paste, or Ctrl V, into the new file; save as a jpeg.
This is good just as regular record-keeping for asset overviews.
Verisign’s proposal slipped by the public, with only half a dozen or so legitimate comments! Thanx for posting, anyone who posted from here! It’s not midnight yet, you can try to comment: vrsn-btappa-amendment@icann.org and see if it will still post. You have to respond to the email ICANN sends back.
Bob and them are getting ready to celebrate! 
Patrick Mevzek made a fitting observation:
There seems to be almost at the same time a desire to put more controls and verifications to registrars operations, as can be learnt from ICANN Requests Internal Working Group to Address Cybersquatting, press release by Doug Brent, Chief Operating Officer of ICANN, citing an email from ICANN COO pointing at some upcoming work on “Cybersquatting: Explicitly tackle the issue of possible cybersquatting by Registrars,” suggesting that cybersquatting be considered a violation of the RAA.
I think this would imply that there may be current problems with registrars and their handling of their own domain names portfolio if I understand the above correctly.
If this the case, it would seem odd to me to give them even more tools to be able to quickly transfer domain names (through the aforementioned BTAPPA service provided by registry) from one registrar to another, that will make disputes procedures even more complicated.