Summary & Analysis of BTAPPA Comments

Patrick Jones, Registry Liaison Manager at ICANN,  consolidated  and summarized comments on the BTAPPA amendment:

Summary & Analysis of BTAPPA Comments

It is unanimous that a 15-day notice of pending transfer is too short:

The timeline for registrants [us] to respond was too short . . . the timeline should at a minimum match with the grace period for a domain name renewal.

- George Smith

Patrick Jones equates dot com & dot net – COMBINED! – with dot biz!

The BTAPPA service was first proposed by Neustar in 2006 was designed to accommodate registrars while at the same time protecting registrants.  Neustar included a 15 day advance notice to registrants of a pending partial bulk transfer.

Who does ICANN think it’s fooling? There’s 2 million DOT BIZ, and 77 million DOT COM. DOT COM is #1; DOT NET is #4. DOT BIZ is only #8.  They’re not even apples to oranges. DOT COM and DOT BIZ are - maybe – caviar to hot dogs. It’s a stretch to assume a process that worked for the #8 extension will work for the #1 and #4 extensions combined!

Security issues which plague the Resistrars of dot com and dot net are not worked out – should ICANN give  more power to Registrars under the present circumstances?  ICANN has some explaining to do!

Category: Reaction
You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.
Leave a Reply

XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>